Power Marketing Without Money

book

Feature Articles

Worksheets

AdFacts
downloadable

Links

 

What's the Deal With Trust?

Question...

There seems to be a general skepticism where I work. Everything is looked at a little cynically. Sometimes it exhibits itself as a very low-level sense of wariness, while at other times it is a very clear and prominent notion that I, or we, or all of us, had better have as our first priority looking out for ourselves. I would describe it as a pervasive feeling of a lack of trust, never too far from the surface, at times seeming to permeate everything we do. This sense of mistrust seems to be operative among individuals, work groups and indeed our entire organization. What can I, or we, do to build trust?

Collaborations response...

For people to be open and honest so they can maximize the way they work and live together, they must feel they can trust the individuals they are working with. We'll discuss a definition of trust, the challenges of trust, broken trust, trust in organizations and what you can do about trust in your own relationships.

Defining Trust

Trust... "the belief that those upon whom we depend will meet our expectations of them." The more we depend on others, the more important trust is in the relationship.

Organizations today are expecting people to work more collaboratively, so it is no wonder that trust comes up as an issue. In fact, we estimate that a minimum of 90% of the organizations and groups with whom we work have "trust" issues - and not because there is too much trust!

The Challenges of Trust

The first challenge is our mindset.
Do you believe that people are trustworthy?
Do you believe that people want to be trusting?

If your answers to these questions are anything other than "Yes", you are not alone, but we ask you to think about it for a moment.

Upon what do you base your responses? We find people typically base their response on just a few incidents or individuals out of literally thousands of interactions with hundreds of people. Is it rational to base your perception of people as not trusting or trustworthy based on these few incidents? We think not.

Another basic question is, Do you believe people generally are trying to do the best they can in situations? Again we would suggest the answer to that question is "yes" the vast majority of the time.

Dave tells us that during his POW experience, the prisoners' basic assumption was that each person was doing the best he could in the circumstances. This total and deep trust was a key part of what held them together and helped them survive each day. You may say they took a "leap of faith," but in the situation it was a leap worth taking.

Thus our basic assumptions form the starting point for our disposition to trust or not trust in every instance. Where we start makes a world of difference.

A second challenge is that we do not all approach trust in the same way. Some people trust you until you break the trust, and others don't trust you until you "earn it." This difference can impact the relationship and lengthen the time to build trust.

We hear people say all the time, "He or she has to earn my trust." We would be willing to grant that there is much truth in that. However, the kicker is that in order for anyone to earn your trust you must be willing to trust them or how are they ever going to earn it? That approach becomes a vicious cycle with no way out. Who is going to make the first move?

So we challenge you to reexamine your basic mindset because your starting point and your mental frame of reference is critical in all interactions.

A third challenge with trust is that we are often expecting something different when we are looking for trust. Since the definition of trust deals with our expectations of each other, it is imperative that we have a great deal of clarity around those expectations.

There are also different levels of trust. I don't suddenly have deep trust in you. Rather trust is likely to build over time. Consider these three levels of trust:

Level 1 - Trustworthiness: "I believe": Building reliability, openness & integrity
Level 2 - Consistency: "I trust": Counting on one another
Level 3 - Faith: "Ultimate trust": Going beyond the facts

If you are measuring our trust at Level 1 and I am measuring at Level 3, you are likely to have amore positive statement about the level of trust we share. So, we need to have a conversation about what trust means to each of us.

Broken Trust

It isn't always easy to understand how trust is built, yet we certainly know when it's missing or broken. And, while we each react in our own way to a betrayal, people seem to agree that rebuilding broken trust takes longer, if it is regained at all.

The "betrayal of trust" is a huge error, a devastating mistake in both leadership and relationships. It is an error whose damage is incredibly difficult to repair. It is no wonder that a few incidents where trust is betrayed tend to have an impact which is completely out of proportion considering one's total experience.

Organizational Trust

The climate of trust in organizations comes largely from the leadership and, of course, to some extent, we all exercise a degree of leadership. In Learning to Lead, Warren Bennis and Joan Goldsmith describe four ingredients for trust:

Constancy - Whatever surprise leaders themselves face, they do not create any for the group. They maintain continuity and security.

Congruity - Leaders walk their talk. There is no gap between the theories they espouse and the ones they practice. Their morality is found in their behavior.

Reliability - Leaders are there when it counts. They are ready to support their coworkers in the moments that matter.

Integrity - Leaders honor their commitments and promises. They are ethical in their relationships.

What Can You Do?

Facilitators use several activities which are designed to reinforce and show examples of trust being very effective. You've probably been exposed to some of them. Some are simple activities such as "trust walks" where one person is blind folded and led around by a partner, or "trust falls" where one person catches another as he falls backward. Other activities are more complex, but all are designed to clearly demonstrate trust in action and can provide an opportunity for a group to discuss their trust issues.

Probably the best way to work on trust is to challenge your own assumptions and beliefs about trust. To the extent that trust is an issue in your life or your organization, we suggest that if you will change your attitude and mindset to be more trusting, there will be a change in the constellation around you.

Where do you need to focus on trust?

Do you have relationships where trust is important? Write the names of those people with whom you need, or want, to have strong trust (family members, employees, peers, your boss, etc.) Then, evaluate two things:

1) How much trust do they have in me -- high, medium or low? and

2) How much trust do I have in them?

Now, what will you do to either maintain or increase the trust with each individual? Create your plan and start working it!

 

Back to "Features" Menu

This article is from the Collaborations newsletter for additional information contact:

Dave Carey
http://www.davecarey.com

dave@davecarey.com
Please feel free to send your comments or questions to:

Dave Carey
PO Box 28085
San Diego, CA 92198
858.485.1530 (voice)
858.485.1007 (fax)

Top 5 ranked Trust-building Behaviors

  • Communicates with me openly and honestly, without distorting any information

  • Shows confidence in my abilities by treating me as a skilled, competent associate.

  • Keeps promises and commitments.

  • Listens to and values what I say, even though he or she might not agree.

  • Cooperates with me and looks for ways we can help each other.



Top 5 ranked Trust-reducing Behaviors

  • Acts more concerned about his or her own welfare than anything else.

  • Sends mixed messages so that I never know where he or she stands.

  • Avoids taking responsibility for action ("passes the buck" or "drops the ball.")

  • Jumps to conclusions without checking the facts first.

  • Makes excuses or blames others when things don't work out ("finger-pointing.")

 

Make Your Advertising Message Stand Out With Original Stock Photography -- Only $30 per single image -- $95 for panoramas. 

 

 

Back to "Features" Menu