As we do sales training and talk
with sales managers, I'm constantly amazed at how many have the
training cart away out in front of the horse.
Their sales training has included
lots of fancy closing techniques and complicated objection handling
strategies. Yet most of their sales people - new and experienced
- do not have a working grasp of the fundamentals!
Each sales rep carries a mental
and physical "tool kit" into every meeting, What's
in their kit will determine how successful a result they can
build.
The basic mental tools include
simple qualifying questions, an understanding of how to get primary
and secondary needs on the table clearly articulated features
and benefits to fit those needs, an ability to consciously use
"thought" and "fact" questions appropriately
to steer the conversation, and a simple closing technique.
The physical kit should have
the material required to use their corporate entity as a powerful
feature/benefit unto itself, simple feature explanation vehicles
(people go along with what they think they understand - witness
Reaganomics) adequate "proofs" specifically designed
for a variety of situations, quick "ball-park estimating"
capability, and an action planning device of some sort.
Before a sales manager starts
teaching the latest whiz-bang tricks for doing on the spot price/value
analysis, they should know that all their people have all the
fundamentals in their tool kit; and are comfortable using them.
To do otherwise is like sending a man out to build a house equipped
with a load of shingles!
So why is this such an easy trap
to fall into? (It must be, because so many folks are in it!)
As I reflect on my experience, I can identify five reasons that
make sense to me.
1. Time distorts memories. It's
hard for managers to remember what they knew - and didn't know-when
they started. A teenager recently asked me, "who's allowed
to buy stocks, and where do you go to buy them?" I was momentarily
taken aback. I thought everyone know about stockbrokers etc.
If they'd asked me about the differences between stock warrants
and debentures, I might have considered that a reasonable question
and been glad to show off what I know. (which gets us into point
2).
Because we were taught the fundamentals
long ago (or more likely learned them through osmosis and trial
and error), doesn't mean everyone else has them firmly in place.
2. Managers ego's. This is a
very large, and even more sensitive subject. Particularly if
we're talking about the typical SALES manager, or small business
owner. But it's not only true, it's important, so we'll charge
ahead.
Most managers love to show off
of the troops. To win their respect and admiration, to justify
their jobs to their subordinates, (wrong direction of course,
but that's another subject), to challenge their own creativity
and talent, or because it's just plain fun for most of us.
Therefore we tell war stories
about the time we brought 14 dancing elephants (there were actually
only six) into the presidents office (he was really the purchasing
agent) and clinched the million dollar contract (read $700,000.)
that made us the #1 office for the year (or #2 for the quarter,
or whatever).
I exaggerate. But the point is
valid. We don't talk enough about the 80% of our success that
came from the routine regular use of our fundamental tool kit.
The stories that inspire the most are the ones that others can
emulate.
Managers also have better recall
of the strategies and techniques they were using when they were
most recently in the field. Handling the toughest accounts. Dealing
with the most complex situations. Bringing in the long-haul,
big-ticket deals.
Is this what most of your people
spend most of their time doing? Do you want them chasing glamour
deals, or would you prefer more volume in the bread and butter
department?
One other ego-related factor.
When managers try to pass on
the skills that made them successful, they naturally want to
pass along their "best". Again they go back to their
most recent sales successes. When they were at their most experienced,
sophisticated stages of expertise. Long after they had acquired
a "second nature" mastery of the fundamentals. "If
only I could get them to do what I did", is a common refrain.
The question to ask yourself
is 'When?". When you were already a superstar, or while
you were getting successful? They can't emulate you without your
foundation!
What stage are your people at?
(Are you sure?). You don't earn my respect by showing me how
good you are, but by helping me get more successful.
3. We forget which side of the
mic the audience is on. I'll be candid, I've been guilty of it
too. It's a constant struggle not to fill training sessions with
material that's fun to teach. Four
models of personality
types with individual tests and lots of good jokes included in
the explanations. Or the latest theory we saw at the convention
in Houston, that we know none of our people have ever seen before.
Is that what our folks need the
most; or is it mostly keeping us interested in the training program?
It's tough to teach the fundamentals repeatedly. But people cannot
be expected to master things they've only been exposed to once
or twice.
(Corporate training departments
are the worst culprits. They're constantly looking for new material
to "update" their programs. Pretty soon there aren't
any fundamentals left in any of them!)
You'd be amazed at how many experienced
and "well trained" reps have never seen, or have lost
sight of, the fundamental components of the sales tool kit.
4. "If all you have is a
hammer, every situation looks like a nail". Sales reps,
and many managers, think that marketing, or advertising, or training,
or somebody else ought to be giving them the tools for their
kit. They figure they're supposed to work with what they've been
given.
I've never seen a good kit built
by anyone other than the sales reps (with the help of their manager
of course). No one else understands what's supposed to be in
it. No one else understands how to use it.
Full
8x10 glossies of
your latest ad are of virtually no use during a sales call. They're
designed to get you in the door with a fighting chance, not out
with a commitment. Yet lots of reps carry them around thinking
they are the tool kit, because that's what they've been given.
It takes time, knowledge, and
effort to build a good, practical kit. And it will pay a 1000%
better return than a week of cold calling!
5. My last comment is about the
absurd expectations created by some people in my own industry.
I constantly receive brochures
on seminars and programs promising outlandish results from ultra-fancy
systems. A recent example with the headline "CLOSE MORE
SALES" included the following:
- 10 objection handling formulas
guaranteed to work
- 30 to 40 closes for different situations
- techniques to quality every prospect
- how to never have a bad month
- professional presentation methods
- emotional and psychological factors in selling
In addition to the above content,
this seminar promised to:
- eliminate competition!
- convert all inquiries into sales!
- NEVER lose sales to lower prices!
- 5 steps GUARANTEEING a 100% sales increase in 30 days!
To top it all off, the sponsor
can accomplish all of this during a single three hour seminar!
(We saved the brochure - I couldn't make this up!)
I've been in sales and sales
training for 15 years, am an audio cassette junkie, and would
be hard pressed to come up with 30 different closes. And I know
for sure that exposing sales people to this kind of training
is no way to build a successful team.
If there were sure fire gimmicks
that were a short cut to superlative sales performance, believe
me, no one would be giving them away for a few thousands bucks
(let alone $95. per person). Yet even sales managers are tempted
into wishful thinking about the quick-fix solution.
Having described my five observations,
I guess I should recognize the obvious. Not all of them will
fit every manager or rep. Whatever your current situation, I
suggest they do deserve some thought.
Allow me two concluding remarks.
Firstly, I'm not suggesting you train every salesperson at all
levels the same way. Some will get minimal benefits from a review
of the fundamentals. I'll discuss one way of determining who
should get what in a later article.
Secondly, I'm not recommending
a totally "back to the basics" approach. Only that
before we cover "strategic blueprints to reverse a 20/80
purchasing spread" or "how to plant critical objections
for specific competitors" we make sure everyone is consistently,
and effectively, using the primary building blocks. In my experience
a lot more people could benefit from this kind of training that
it might initially appear.
Not back to basics; forward with
the fundamentals!
Warren Evans is a prominent
Canadian consultant and trainer based in Mississauga, Ontario.
A popular and dynamic speaker, he's addressed audiences across
Canada, the U.S. and in the Caribbean and Europe